Sunday, April 14, 2013

A520.3.5.RB_HallMike


As I have discussed several times this week on the discussion boards, supportive communication at my job is both good in some areas and bad in others.  While I would describe interaction amongst my peers as highly supportive, I will fully admit that I am no expert at it and have only been accidentally communicating in a supportive manner without knowing it.  Luckily I have a large group of people to practice my supportive communication skills with – midshipmen.  We have to do a counseling session at least twice a semester so this provides an excellent opportunity to specifically practice it in preparation for having to deal with communication at the higher levels of the organization where supportive communication isn’t the strong point.

Supportive communication is an outstanding way to move people towards behavior that is either more efficient or more correct than what they are doing now.  From Whetten and Cameron, supportive communication is congruent (meaning your verbal and non-verbal cues match what you are actually thinking), is descriptive of problems, is problem vice person oriented, validates individuals (i.e. provides positive feedback), and is specific vice global (247-253).  In other words, it provides an easily understood, factual, objective, non-personal feedback to another individual in order to change behavior.  While it sounds easy, it is something that must be practiced and consciously thought about to ensure you do it properly.  From a working with midshipmen standpoint, this means that I will use supportive communication in order to coach them towards better performance or counsel them when their performance is substandard (either militarily or academically).  When reviewing the behavioral guidelines, I think I already do a pretty good job using them with the exception of maybe one – owning statements.  When talking over things with students, I often refer to the standards as being the Navy standards; what I should be saying is that they are not meeting what standards I have set for them.  While these standards will be directly in line with the Navy, it makes me own the comment and the standard.  Hopefully this will add a personal effect to the conversation and allow the midshipman to more fully understand both the problem and the solution.  Ironically enough, I think owning the standards is exactly why my CO on the ALASKA was so effective.  Rather than holding us to Navy standards, he held us to his standards, and when you didn’t meet them, he would let you know he was disappointed but that we will correct the problem and get better.  I am 100% positive that hearing that he was disappointed was worse than any yelling or dressing down that he could have done – I don’t think it would have been near as effective if it was the Navy standards we weren’t meeting.  This idea is exactly what I am going to try to work with my MIDN on.

Moving on to dealing with the upper chain of command, I think one thing is very important to understand – just because you are subordinate to someone doesn’t mean that your opportunity to lead them diminishes.  In fact, this can be one of the most challenging but rewarding aspects of being a leader (Beaman).  This process known as upward leadership is something that I should definitely work on in my current situation.  Specifically, I need to help my supervisor using supportive communication.  How I am going to do this without specifically calling him out on it, I’m not sure; but I do know that I will repeatedly use supportive communication explicitly when communicating with him in the future.  While I don’t think I have necessarily ever not followed supportive communication, as with the MIDN I will definitely keep it in mind when discussing things with him when I think he could have done things differently.  Hopefully this will lead to better communication coming from him down to us and also result in a little less tension in the office as most of us are on edge with what he is going to do next.  While I’m not going to hold my breath, any increase in the communication methods from him will be seen as a win across the office.

Whetten, D., & Cameron, K. (2011). Developing management skills. (Eighth ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education Inc.

Beaman, L. (n.d.). Upward leadership: Lead up to your leader. Retrieved from http://lisabeaman.hubpages.com/hub/Upward-Leadership-Leading-Up-to-Your-Leader

No comments:

Post a Comment