Sunday, April 28, 2013

A633.5.3.RB_HallMike


The video “Who Needs Leaders” is a pretty eye opening example of self-organization in a complex system.  In the video, Nick Obolensky instructs a group of 30 or so people to quickly select 2 people, unbeknownst to them, and maintain an equal distance from these two individuals without any sudden movements – an exercise from him Complex Adaptive Leadership book (Obolensky 2012).  After only 1 minute, the group stabilized after everyone had followed the instructions.  At the close of the video, the author asked how that exercise would have gone with a leader there to direct it.  Trying to place myself in that situation, I’m not sure how I would have handled trying to instruct these people how to move accordingly based on the complex interrelationships between the people (i.e. he needs to stay equidistance from these 2 but each of them needs to stay away from this guy and so on).  This would have been way too complicated to try and figure out if not impossible.  Clearly the lesson learned here is that a complex system will self-organize, that solutions to problems will naturally evolve from the system itself, and that often the best leadership is to just sit back and let things work itself out.

I’m not sure I could say this video changed my understanding of chaos theory except to say that it further solidified my take that it doesn’t take more than a few variables to make a system a complex one.  More so than the previous classes to date, this class has really had an impact on how I perceive day to day operations and how I should go about attempting to tackle problems.  However it definitely has an implication on strategy.  Clearly self-organization is a natural phenomenon which means that people should trust some of the other aspects of complex adaptive systems and complexity science.  For example, and speaking from experience, I would have an incredibly hard time not trying to interject my influence into a system when looking at a solution to a problem.  This is against the Taoist approach to complexity science which states “go with the flow”.  Many people have a hard time accepting that sometimes problems are outside of their control and that it might be better to just sit on your hands for a bit to see what happens (myself included).  This video has shown me that I really need to do just that if I am dealing with a complex system.  Interestingly enough, this is in alignment with the Cynefin network of problem solving for complex systems.  In this network, you probe the system to sense how it responds while looking for underlying solutions (Cynefin, 2013).  Once you have probed and gathered information, you take action based on the results of your probing.  The whole idea is to look for emergent solutions (the purpose of probing).

The bottom line is that to deal with a complex system, you really need to be walking along the border between perceived chaos and control (again perceived).  On one hand, you want a controlled system so that you can make the system respond in the way you would like it to since that is how we have operated most of our lives (you are the master of your own fate).  On the other side, you have a system that appears completely out of control that responds to none of your inputs.  What you must understand/acknowledge is that even though a system may appear chaotic, it is just your inability to understand/see the complex inner working of the system and that it is just responding to its natural arrangement.  As a result, the recommended approach is to sit back and watch the system do its thing while looking for patterns to evolve and solutions to emerge from it – a definite tough sell to type a personalities but one they must buy into.  After all, patience is one of the 3 things taught by Lao Tzu who apparently did actually know a thing or two about complexity!

Obolensky, N. (Producer). (2008, April 12). Who Needs Leaders? [Web Video]. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41QKeKQ2O3E

Obolensky, N. (2012). Complex adaptive leadership, embracing paradox and uncertainty. Gower Publishing Company.

Cynefin. (2013, March 28). Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cynefin

No comments:

Post a Comment